bluetiger wrote:Same here. I don't get any text for the new stuff except Asso's story.
Whatever is being used to generate the HTML and CSS is creating tons and tons of syntax errors. I'm guessing it's computer generated because, while each page has dozens to hundreds of errors, they are all very similar, like a computer made them. It looks like Firefox and Safari ignore the crap and attempt to display the text but IE just bails out. It also could be the files contain XHTML tags but identify themselves as plain old HTML. I know IE makes some assumptions about what to do when there is no DOCTYPE directive. All versions of XHTML require a DOCTYPE directive and it could be Microsoft built this assumption into IE. Please see
Section 3.1 of the
XHTML 1.0 spec.
Two tools I use a lot, and I would
highly recommend them to any HTML coder, are the
World Wide Web Consortium's
Markup Validation Service and their
CSS Validation Service. While neither can help you much with coding around Microsoft's
particular interpretation of the standards, both can at least ensure you've generated syntactically correct HTML and CSS. That's a big step in the direction of getting it right semantically.
Even better, Microsoft's IE8 does a
much better job adhering to standards than IE6 and IE7 when the syntax is correct. As IE8 becomes more mainstream, Web coders will get even more benefits from correct markup.