A word about the novels

The bread and butter!

Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain

User avatar
honeybee
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1644
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:09 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: A word about the novels

Postby honeybee » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:49 pm

That's one of the things I loved about ENT - it retroactively did a way with the TOS sense that a women could not be in command! And people hated the idea of a prequel. :roll: Love Erika.
Now Playing: Embers, Spark, Flame the Prequel to Family Secrets

Image

Avatar made by Hopeful Romantic! Thanks!

User avatar
Reanok
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:34 pm
Show On Map: No

Re: A word about the novels

Postby Reanok » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:55 pm

I liked Erica Hernandez being in command of the Columbia. I disliked what happened to her character and what happened to the Columbia crew in the Destiny Books. :thumbsdown:

User avatar
Aquarius
Site Admin
Posts: 4079
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:23 am
Location: B.F.E.
Contact:

Re: A word about the novels

Postby Aquarius » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:07 pm

Part of the TOS attitudes about women in authority were based on test audience reactions to "The Cage." Remember, Majel Barrett played the first officer. Women, of all people, didn't like it. "Who does she think she is?" t hey complained. Threw Gene for a loop. They were ready for a racially integrated cast, but not a take-charge woman.
Eian built my avatar! Banner by Misplaced!

Image

User avatar
honeybee
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1644
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:09 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: A word about the novels

Postby honeybee » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:12 pm

While that is true, I will also say that there's some evidence that the focus groups of women back then were deliberately chosen to reinforce the attitudes of the males in power. I don't know that happened with the Cage, I have seen stories of advertising agencies pre-screening their female focus groups to be make sure they represented "the average" woman - the average woman being someone who wants to be a homemaker and nothing else.

So, while I'm sure that sexism played a part in the axing of the Number One character - I am skeptical that it was all because women didn't want to see a woman in power. Some women didn't - but some did.
Now Playing: Embers, Spark, Flame the Prequel to Family Secrets

Image

Avatar made by Hopeful Romantic! Thanks!

User avatar
Silverbullet
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 3507
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 4:38 pm
Show On Map: No
Location: Casa Grande , Arizona

Re: A word about the novels

Postby Silverbullet » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:14 pm

What about Elizabeth the first of England? Cristiaa Of Sweden Elenaor Of Aquatain, Catherine of russia? Cieopatra? Historicaly the Cambodians had Women Generals who led Armies in to Battle. Outstanding women whe made a great mark on the World.
I am Retired. Having a good time IS my job


Image

User avatar
Alelou
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 7894
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:05 pm
Twitter username: @sheerhubris
Show On Map: No
Location: Upstate New York
Contact:

Re: A word about the novels

Postby Alelou » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:22 pm

Focus groups are SOOOO easy to screw up at so many levels. All it really takes is one overbearing loud-mouth to totally skew the results even if you don't mess up the pre-screening survey.

And if the guys running the groups are already skeptical ... forget it. It's doomed.
OMG, ANOTHER new chapter! NORTH STAR Chapter 28
Image.Image
Read opening chapters free at Amazon (US): The Awful Mess: A Love Story
Blog: Sheer Hubris Press / Twitter: @sheerhubris / Facebook: Sandra Hutchison

User avatar
Aquarius
Site Admin
Posts: 4079
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:23 am
Location: B.F.E.
Contact:

Re: A word about the novels

Postby Aquarius » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:25 pm

honeybee wrote:While that is true, I will also say that there's some evidence that the focus groups of women back then were deliberately chosen to reinforce the attitudes of the males in power. I don't know that happened with the Cage, I have seen stories of advertising agencies pre-screening their female focus groups to be make sure they represented "the average" woman - the average woman being someone who wants to be a homemaker and nothing else.

So, while I'm sure that sexism played a part in the axing of the Number One character - I am skeptical that it was all because women didn't want to see a woman in power. Some women didn't - but some did.


If that is indeed the case, that would've been the network's doing, not the studio's (owned by a woman) or Gene's (wanted his girlfriend to have a job and lots of screen time).
Eian built my avatar! Banner by Misplaced!

Image

User avatar
Lady Rainbow
Captain
Captain
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:37 pm
Twitter username: ladyrainbow
Location: Charlotte NC
Contact:

Re: A word about the novels

Postby Lady Rainbow » Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:08 pm

Reanok wrote:I liked Erica Hernandez being in command of the Columbia. I disliked what happened to her character and what happened to the Columbia crew in the Destiny Books. :thumbsdown:


Yeah. me too. :-(

Her character had so much potential to do good in ENT/The Romulan War era too.
Avatar of Hoshi/Malcom "The Dogwalker" courtesy of ivymae at http://www.captainsoma.com/enterpriseoddities/main.html


Siggy complete with beagle! :)
Image

User avatar
justTripn
Consigliere
Posts: 3991
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:12 pm
Show On Map: No
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: A word about the novels

Postby justTripn » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:51 pm

Oh yeah, Gene Roddenberry talked about how constrained he was by the studio, (and I have no idea where the studio got their ideas; I suppose it could be focus groups). He was going to have the crew be half male and half female, but the studio refused because (NOT ACTUAL QUOTES/ BASED ON MEMORY) "people will think there is alot of funny business going on." So the compromise was a crew that was 1/3 female. And addressing the criticism that the show used women as sex objects he said, "yes abosultely, the show used women as sex objects and will continue to do so; In my defense I also believe in using men as sex objects, and Star Trek will continue to do so."

Thank you, Gene!!! :D

It is also important to remember the context. We've come a long way, Baby! (And who are you calling "Baby"?!) On one of the Star Trek Anniversaries, TV Guide reposted it's early review of Star Trek and it had some cringe-worthy lines. One was a joking aside about Spock. Something like: "Mother warned not to marry beneath yourself." Referring to the fact that Spock was a "half-breed."
I'm donating my body to science fiction.


Return to “Trip and T'Pol Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests