


Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain
# According to Rick Berman, this episode would have been the fourth season finale even if the series had been picked up for a fifth season. He did state, however, that if the series had been renewed, Tucker would still have been killed off because the episode flashed forward in time and so when the show came back for the new season, Tucker would still have been alive. [2] In later interviews, Berman said that if the show had been renewed, several story elements, including Tucker's death, would likely have been changed.
[...]
# Speaking at the 2007 Star Trek convention in Las Vegas, co-writer Brannon Braga admitted he had "regrets" about this episode. He explained that he and Rick Berman were attempting to "send a valentine to all the Star Trek shows," and that "Enterprise just happened to be the show on at the time." He believed the episode "had some great stuff in it" and that "it was a cool concept," but overall, however, he found it to be "languid" and "not a complete success." [4]
# In response to fan criticisms, series producer Manny Coto stated that he personally considered "T A T V" to be a coda rather than the true finale of the series. He considers the two-part story "Demons" and "Terra Prime" that preceded it was the actual finale of the Enterprise storyline according to Coto, and series producer Mike Sussman. [5][6]
# In 2008, Brannon Braga, recalling the episode and its reaction stated "I don't think it's ever going to be a beloved episode." [7]
# At the 2009 Star Trek convention, Jonathan Frakes simply said this episode "stinks." [8]
Alelou wrote:I'm just impressed that Patrick Stewart was actually watching Enterprise.
WarpGirl wrote:WOW Patrick Stewert was positively vitrolic.
Kevin Thomas Riley wrote:Well, in case you (or anyone else) are interested, here is the lengthy review I wrote almost immediately after having seen *the_abomination*.
Sim got a proper funeral and even Porthos (even if that was a dream).
Another fan favourite whose character is assassinated (though not literally) here is Shran. For some unexplained reason he's out of favour with the Andorian Imperial Guard after associating himself with criminal elements :rolleyes:! Uh, that's not the Shran we've got to know these past four years. These criminals (the aliens-of-the-week) believe Shran stole some gem and has kidnapped his daughter in order to get it back. Shran now wants Archer, en route to Earth for the Federation signing ceremony, to help him. The plot is completely nonsensical and serves no other purpose than to set up Trip's death. Shran comes off as a jewel-stealing ass! What an end for our favourite blue-skin!
WarpGirl wrote:Well yes I know that. What I meant was I want to know how the B's thought doing that to Shran was good story telling. I mean they explained every other inane terrible thing they did. The never explained Shran's castration!
justTripn wrote:Kevin Thomas Riley wrote:Well, in case you (or anyone else) are interested, here is the lengthy review I wrote almost immediately after having seen *the_abomination*.
Ha ha!
I've read this before but . . . yeah, it's good. It was fun to hear you fuming. I had forgotten this part:
Sim got a proper funeral and even Porthos (even if that was a dream).
Return to “Trip and T'Pol Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests