blacknblue wrote:Whether he has all of the specific sheepskins or not, Trip would have to hold the equivalent of several Doctoral degrees in mathematics, subatomic physics, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, plasma physics, hydrodynamics, aerodynamics, organic and inorganic chemistry, metallurgy and materials science, and also he would need at least some understanding of ecology and biology in order to maintain the life support systems. At minimum, if not more.
I disagree that he would need an education himself in all these systems. He would need to have a proficient understanding of them but modern day chief engineers on space systems projects
are not experts in every subfield of the project. They usually have a specialty of those subjects, maybe even more than one specialty. It was on a university level, but I have experience with this on a satellite project and our chief engineer was far from a expert on propulsion (my subsystem). In fact, when she went to present our paper to the Air Force Research Lab at Kirtland AFB, I had to brief her on the details of the propulsion system so she would be able to make that presentation proficiently. She was an expert in structures, but was still quite able and intelligent enough to - once briefed on the design/physics/mathematics - be able to grasp those concepts.
You can find a modern day example of this in Pier Oddone, the director of Fermilab from 2004 to 2006 and who's now workin on the LHC at CERN, and he's just a particle physicist, he's not formally educated in all the fields one would need to be educated in to be completely versed in every system at Fermilab or CERN like mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, computer science, like 5 different sub-specialties of physics like solid state condensed matter physics (for the low-temp superconducting electromagnets used to guide the particles), or the number of other fields like you mentioned are necessary on a starship.
So, I think Trip would have to have a specialty and maybe even a dual specialty (like House, hehe) but he wouldn't have to be versed in every system... I don't think think that'd be practical, even in the future. All chief engineers would be like 70 years old to get that much education.
I agree about the command training though. The Marine Corps requires all company grade officers (2Lt, 1Lt, Cpt) to attend a Field Grade Officer School before they are eligble for promotion up to Major, LtCol, or Col. Same from Col to General requiring yet another school called like "General Staff Officer School".
Escriba wrote: I've seen in wikipedia (oh... how I love thee...) that Aerospace engineering's elements are: Fluid mechanics, Astrodynamics, Statics and Dynamics, Mathematics, Electrotechnology, Propulsion, Control engineering, Aircraft structures, Materials science, Solid mechanics, Aeroelasticity, Avionics, Risk and reliability, Noise control and Flight test. But I don't know if all of this can be learned in the same degree or several. So, Aeronautical/Astronautical degree, Mechanical engineering and Advanced Phycics? Besides his Starfleet training.
That sounds right, the only thing is, a person focuses on one of those areas in an undergraduate degree. My best friend who graduated last yr here in aero was specialized in aerodynamics, which sounds broad because it's a relatively well-known term, but it is just as narrow as say "control engineering". He currently works as a flight engineer on the shuttle program since the shuttle flies like a super/hypersonic aircraft during takeoff in the upper atmosphere.
But it would be difficult for someone to become specialized in multiple areas of aero during undergrad. What happens a lot is that during graduate school, while on a project, internship or coop, a student is exposed to multiple discplines through an integrated project and is forced to then develop understandings of those other discplines. But this is more often experienced as a side effect of working on a project rather than taking a whole bunch of extra classes... and probably best so, since aero is an applied engineering field, the theoretical knowledge is not always that useful in application.
Given that we know Trip has to have a great grasp of propulsion physics but seems to have a much more intuitive knowledge of mechanical systems,
I think that simply from a logical point of view, it makes sense to suppose that he has an undergrade degree in mechanical or even electrical engineering systems and then a masters in systems engineering while having worked very hands on with warp systems and thereby gaining a strong hands-on understanding of those systems. But he just doesn't strike me as a math geek, and he'd be a math geek if he had a formal education in particle physics. It doesn't take anything away from him - in fact I think one of the reasons everyone, T'Pol included, is so impressed with his knowledge is BECAUSE it was gained on-site rather than academically.