TPoptarts wrote:Okay something random... so I'm downloading SGA and on the number of seeds it says 1812. And of course this is what jumps into my mind:1812
I want a pet DRD.
I thought war of 1812 as well

Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain
TPoptarts wrote:Okay something random... so I'm downloading SGA and on the number of seeds it says 1812. And of course this is what jumps into my mind:1812
I want a pet DRD.
Alelou wrote:I'm curious. I notice in TNG one calls a female senior officer "Sir."
I don't remember that being done in Enterprise but perhaps I just didn't catch it.
How is it done today in the military branches?
CX wrote:That would be entirely appropriate in the Air Force. I've seen Marines address females as "Ma'am" as well, so you're not exactly gender-neutral yet, which was the point of them doing it that way in TNG in case anyone was wondering.
So basically they're asking if you want all the Basque political parties to start talking about talking about letting people talk about what they want, to come to fruition with a referendum. Hmm. Sounds like a lot of talking is involved.Escriba wrote:Question number 2: Are you in agreement that the Basque political parties, without exclusions, start a process of negotiation to reach a democratic agreement on the rights of the Basque people to decide, and that such an agreement be subjected to a referendum before the end of 2010?
Try to understand this one, because I can't. It has no sense. It's like the hypothesis of the hypothesis of the hypothesis.
Escriba wrote:Sorry, the questions are so stupid that I didn't see the need, but...
Question numer 1: Are you in agreement in supporting a negotiated end to the violence, if ETA beforehand and in an unmistakable way, undertakes to abandon violence for ever?
And I wonder, if ETA announces its end, what do we have to discuss? Weather?
Question number 2: Are you in agreement that the Basque political parties, without exclusions, start a process of negotiation to reach a democratic agreement on the rights of the Basque people to decide, and that such an agreement be subjected to a referendum before the end of 2010?
Try to understand this one, because I can't. It has no sense. It's like the hypothesis of the hypothesis of the hypothesis.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests