Alelou wrote:Well, at least you have the best collection of smilies EVER.
Well...yes.

But I pay for 'em!

Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain
Alelou wrote:Well, at least you have the best collection of smilies EVER.
JadziaKathryn wrote:Since I'm a bit under the weather I've been watching a fair bit of Stargate SG1 the last few days. (Love the SG1 page at All U C.) I watched 6x8 "The Other Guys" just now and John Billingsley guest starred. He was fantastic, and the episode was awesome. I checked and it aired Aug. '02 so he was playing Phlox at the time, but his character is a Trekkie. So the episode had a couple of great Trek moments. "We might as well be wearing red shirts."![]()
Plus, I could identify with his character (except the math part): "I'm not a soldier! I teach applied math at Yale, I ride a Vespa and I have two cats!" Billingsley is really a good comedic actor.
Distracted wrote:He's not a doctor, though. He just plays one on TV. So he's allowed to ask why not, and it's a legitimate question. Over the course of the series Phlox's character did a whole host of things which would not be considered ethical by current medical standards. Why should this situation be any different? He would be providing the treatment needed to save her life. And should Phlox, as a Denobulan, be confined to the restrictions of the Hippocratic oath, which after all is a completely human invention?
Things that make you go, hmmmm....
Distracted wrote:Meh. Nauseated maybe, and not really by the idea of having sex with a patient. Although there's never a justification for it in real life, there's also no non-fictional potentially fatal condition for which sex is the life-saving treatment.
WarpGirl wrote:That's because Victorian people were ALL perverts!
WarpGirl wrote:Why you haven't?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests