Silverbullet wrote:Lets say you are XO on the Enterprise. Designated as such. You have the Rank, etc. then a tellerite Officer is brought on board and soomeone says he outranks you. he is now XO. You would scream like Hell. claiming that the Tellerite doesn't know straight up abut Starfleet or its workings, regs, etc.You would be right. That is trip's position. He is far more qualified than T'Pol to be XO . she has spent her entire career in the vulcan military a different animal altogether.
SB
And yet, he doesn't protest at all! There is no sign at all that during T'Pol serving on Enterprise any one protested against her role - not even Trip who had every right to be, not a single crew member is protesting as T'Pol takes over as captain when Archer is away. When T'Pol and Archer are both on surface, Trip is the commanding officer. So the chain of command is clear: Archer - T'Pol - Trip.
Now I agree with you that's a little odd that a Vulcan would be taking over command when Archer isn't present (Trip would be the more obvious choice), but everybody is treating her being acting captain as a totally normal thing.
So my guess is everybody agreed with the chain of command being Archer - T'Pol - Trip and that in a time not everybody including Archer liked Vulcans.
I don't understand why this is even an issue, because it isn't an issue on the show. You may think that T'Pol isn't a likable person, or that Vulcans shouldn't be in command of a Human ship or that females shouldn't be in command. But that doesn't change the fact T'Pol is the second in command.
But I stop now, because no matter what arguments is brought to the table for T'Pol being a XO, you probably wouldn't agree on this subject.