blacknblue wrote:Granted that Columbus was a slaver, but so were many of the Indians that he killed and enslaved. The "noble savage" myth is no more true than the golden boy image of Columbus. People of every color back then were products of their time, and very few of them were saints. Human life was cheap, and human livestock was highly prized by most people in most places.
Yeah. Call me dark. Call me cynical. But am I wrong?
No, you're not. Interesting factoid, in case, you know, you're ever on
Jeopardy!: nearly all of the African slaves brought to the Americas were collected by African slavers. (Not, generally, of the same tribes.) Europeans died in alarming numbers if they ventured far from the coast so they bought their slaves from African slavers. To be fair, the African view of slavery was much different than the European view and what developed in the Americas. (It wasn't race-based or inherited, for one thing.) But in the history of slavery, it happened over and over that the first thing a freed slave couldn't wait to do was get slaves of their own. Sadly, the cynical view has a lot of historical backing.
But I think you're on to something about the chocolate,
Escriba...