enterprikayak wrote:I press ctrl+C now and copy the text b4 I hit send, and then if I get cut off, I can paste it back.
Heh I do the same thing
Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain
enterprikayak wrote:I press ctrl+C now and copy the text b4 I hit send, and then if I get cut off, I can paste it back.
CX wrote:So, long story short, this comes from a writer's bible Roddenberry and one of his friends wrote up when they were still developing TMP, part of which lays out how the new humanity is supposedly super open about sex and relationships (think Brave New World) and don't really believe in marriage anymore. Just a prime example of why TNG sucked, especially the first two seasons of it.
Hmph. Who needs the Borg at that rate?Kevin Thomas Riley wrote:It also mentioned the "new humans" who preferred to let their individuality get sucked into different group consciousnesses. *shudders*
JadziaKathryn wrote:Kevin Thomas Riley wrote:It also mentioned the "new humans" who preferred to let their individuality get sucked into different group consciousnesses. *shudders*
Hmph. Who needs the Borg at that rate?
Actually, these robo-humans would think, "Sweet! Group consciousness on steroids! Assimilate me first!"
I don't know about that. Data was pretty enlightened but still interesting.thecursor wrote: Notice all the really interesting people in Trek are delightfully unenlightened.
thecursor wrote:Technocrats don't work, they don't actually debate anything, they're supposed to only pursue knowledge and artistic achievement but without the conflict of society I can't imagine how crappy their art must be.
Alelou wrote:I don't know who Two Gun Bob is, but I agree with almost everything you said. I much preferred Picard to Kirk, though.
Roddenberry's ideas about humanity really got in the way of TNG.
Which must be why they all read Shakespeare and play jazz... All the good art has already been made!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests