Rigil Kent wrote:Also funny: Superman is a Dick. It's a collection of actual Superman covers throughout the years that show he's kind of a butt nugget. They're hilarious.
OMG. I thought Archer was an ass...
Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain
Rigil Kent wrote:Also funny: Superman is a Dick. It's a collection of actual Superman covers throughout the years that show he's kind of a butt nugget. They're hilarious.
CoffeeCat wrote:Rigil Kent wrote:Also funny: Superman is a Dick. It's a collection of actual Superman covers throughout the years that show he's kind of a butt nugget. They're hilarious.
OMG. I thought Archer was an ass...
Rigil Kent wrote:Here's the review I made of it for WWBJ after I first caught it.
Spider-Man 3
Unfocused. Seriously, that's how I'd classify this movie. I've recently read how Avi Arad (the producer) pushed Sam Raimi into using Venom (whom Raimi doesn't like) because Venom is such a popular character (how I don't understand), and it shows. Honestly, Venom serves no purpose whatsoever in this movie, nor for that matter does the "black suit."
The entire movie is tied together by a string of numerous conveniences that just irked me. It's convenient that the alien symbiote lands near the only super-powered hero in this continuity's universe. It's convenient that Harry suffers from amnesia after a shaky, claustrophobic fight. It's convenient that there is a high tech experimental lab for Flint Marko to fall into to become Sandman. It's convenient that Aunt May shows up to pass on a bit of wisdom. It's convenient for the Osborn butler to have seen & heard some stuff so he can pass it on at the dramatically appropriate moment.
It's also pretty sad that the Love Interest (Mary Jane) is clearly outshined by Betty Brant (the luscious Elizabeth Banks) and Gwen Stacey (the equally gorgeous Bryce Dallas Howard). Compared to those two, Kirsten Dunst looks ... washed out.
Some of the fights were not bad, some of them were poorly done. Seeing Spidey bounce around like he should was okay although there were a couple of scenes that were so obviously CG that it hurts. The guy playing JJ Jameson was hilarious, and there was a pretty funny scene with Bruce Campbell. Franco (Harry Osborn) was pretty good too, but Tobey Macguire seemed ... bored.
And there were three fricking singing routines in this movie. No crap.
So I can't, in any honesty, give it higher than a 2.5 out of 5. It didn't suck, but it wasn't very great. Go watch Hot Fuzz instead.
Chris wrote:I haven't seen X-Men 3 yet. What was wrong with that one so I can prepare myself if I do see it?
Chris wrote:I couldn't take Thomas Haden Church as the Sandman seriously because I still remember him as Lowell on Wings which was on TV way too long.
I haven't seen X-Men 3 yet. What was wrong with that one so I can prepare myself if I do see it?
JadziaKathryn wrote:I hardly ever see it now, because it's on cable that I don't get at home.
Reanok wrote:Tony Shalob starred in Galaxy Quest he was great in that movie also the actor who plays Crewmen Daniels in Enterprise starred in this movie too. If you've never seen this movie Jadzia. I think you'd enjoy it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests