Pegmumm wrote:Wasn't Be'lanna half klingon?
And the mother of Worf's son, Alexander human/Klingon?
There's Spock of course.
All the Cardassian/Bajoran crosse
And Elizabeth, daughter of Trip and T'pol. The question isn't whether it happens, but whether it requires medical intervention. I don't believe there is any indication that any of the above were 'natural' (unaided) conceptions.
Pegmumm wrote:Science fiction is what it is. As an old science fiction collector... whether or not it contains real science has never mattered.
I disagree. It DOES matter. As a general rule, the better the science, the better the science fiction. And, sure, I can accept some techno-babble and hand-waving around technology that does not exist and may never exist. (Warp drives, matter transporters, subspace radios, etc...) But to have things that are flatly impossible without the slightest attempt at an explanation is an insult to my intelligence. The episode 'Sim' comes to mind. By what physical mechanism did Sim end up with all of Trip's memories? It was never explained. For me, that one fact ruined the whole episode. Instead of being able to enjoy the story line, I could only shake my head in disbelief and marvel at the ignorance of the script writers.
Which brings me to my next point. I have always felt there is a double standard regarding math and the hard sciences. I know many highly educated, highly intelligent people who freely proclaim their ignorance of math and science. There is no stigma involved in such an admission. In fact some people say it as if they are actually proud of the fact. Now compare that to the shame someone would feel at admitting they were functionally illiterate and you'll see what I mean about a double standard. My personal belief (backed by no facts or evidence beyond the actual text of the episodes) is that 'Enterprise' writers fell into the category of the science-challenged (and not ashamed to admit it).
But nobody cares that the people writing SCIENCE fiction scripts for TV are ignorant of basic physics. I'd be willing to bet that the script of every medical drama is vetted by at least one doctor. I'll bet the script of every legal show is reviewed by at least one lawyer. But how many scientists or engineers do you suppose reviewed Enterprise's scripts? I'd be willing to bet Zero. Zip. Nada.
So, yeah, technical accuracy matters to me. I will even accept plot devices that are blatantly impossible--as long as I feel the writer recognizes it is a problem and has made an attempt (no matter how feeble) to address that fact in the story. Just give me SOMETHING. In the Sim episode, they could have done something like this:
ARCHER: "Phlox, Sim is remembering things only Trip could know. What the hell is going on here?"
PHLOX: "Because their brains are exactly the same, Sims memory synapses are resonating with Trip's. His brain is remotely accessing Trip's memories as if they were his own."
There. One line of pseudo-science, and I'm happy. An attempt was made to explain it, now I can get on with the story.
Now was that so hard?