I've decided to pick up ginamr's episode-challenge for "Fusion". That's one of the episode, which makes me punch the hate-button frantically, mainly because Archer solved the issue by just sending the rapist on his merry way.
Now what would have happened if they decided to put Tolaris on trial? Even if the crime was comitted by a Vulcan against a Vulcan, it happened on Earth Territory and T'Pol was assigned to an Earth ship, so my common sense tells me that it would fall under Earth jurisdiction.
Which brings me to the problematic bit. Has Archer the right to preside over a trial? In later Trek's the trials always happened on Space stations, who had justice personel assigned to them. That is something that doesn't exist in that era, so I came up with 3 theories:
1) Archer has the right to call a trial if he can't deliver the accused into Starfleet custody within a certain time (lets say 3 months)
2) Archer has the ríght to call a trial, but he has to formally declare a state-of-emergency before
3) Archer has no right to call a trial, but must abort his mission immediately and must deliver the accused into Starfleet custody, no matter how long the journey
4) Archer has no right to call a trial and the accused has to spend time in the brig, awaiting his trial however long it takes that the ship is back on Earth, even if it takes years.
Which one would be the most realistic ?
aunt EDITH: Just noticed that this would probably fit better into the non-ship forum
