Kevin Thomas Riley wrote:As I said above, I know that the MACO depicted aren't like the special ops they probably were thought to be. But in my (and co-incidentally your's, in Endeavour) version of post-season four ENT, the MACOs are much more competent.
My version doesn't count, however, 'cause they've got a TAC who
was a MACO and is directly responsible for their level of competence.
The problem with making Security guys competent, though, is that goes directly against 40+ years of Trek history where they've firmly established that they
weren't competent. Ever. It's why I've acknowledged that my
Endeavour series is very obviously an AU that won't lead to TOS or TNG, since my Starfleet is actually a military.
Kevin Thomas Riley wrote:The ship is understaffed as it is, with both crew and officers, given that they have 3-4 shifts to fill out.
And why do they need 3-4 shifts? A modern American submarine has two shifts (Blue and Gold), and they're able to survive without difficulty. I'm not sure how you can say that they're necessarily understaffed, though, since I seem to recall that they established early in the series that sleeping space was already at a premium. (Still dunno where they put the MACOs at ...)
Besides, you yourself has put an officer-in-charge (Lt jg Reynolds, Hayes and Stiles respectively) of the MACOs on
Endeavour, while the TAC is Lt Cmdr Eisler!

Apples and oranges. From it's original inception,
Endeavour was intended to be a warship. Further, the OIC that you mention is primarily the WSO, not the security chief. Eisler's primary job has moved beyond TAC to a sort of co-XO.
Look, I think we're done with this exchange.
Okay. No need to get angry - I was just disagreeing with you.
JadziaKathryn wrote:Rigil, I think you're right about low expectations in Trek, but I also must add that to those of us non-military types, the MACOS can look pretty efficient and impressive. I'm not saying that justifies sloppy writing, but just idly noting something.
Seriously? You thought they were impressive? *shakes head* There's a laundry list of things that they did wrong, things that I would have recognized as being wrong before I ever considered joining the military...
Ah well.
I never heard anything about the Bakula 50% contract,
I don't think that there was one ... that was my way of pointing out that, unlike DS9 which could have Sisko show up for thirty seconds and not be in the rest of an episode, Bakula seemed to be in almost every single scene of an episode. I'm not going to comment whether that's good or bad since pretty much everyone already knows what I think about that.
Who knows - they could've even expanded on the Hess character enough to give her a first name!
Or an actress. Although I'd rather they focus on the characters we already have instead of introducing even more...